Bridging the Divide — Research Survey · Inclusive Leadership Lab

National Research Survey

Bridging the Divide

Trust Between Special Education and General Education Leadership Teams

A national mixed-methods research survey examining the professional relationship between special education directors and general education leaders across U.S. public school districts.

Conducted by Dr. Nikki Harding and Dr. Crista Grimwood of Inclusive Leadership Lab. Your participation directly shapes a field-wide understanding of what divides these teams and what brings them together.

Study Overview Mixed Methods
46items
Survey instrument length
5RQs
Research questions addressed
12–15
Minutes to complete
U.S.
Public school districts nationwide
Likert scales for attitude and perception measurement
Behavioral frequency scales for practice patterns
Forced-choice ranking for priority assessment
Role-based conditional logic by respondent type

Why this relationship determines everything

When special education and general education leadership teams operate in silos, students with disabilities pay the price. Resources are misaligned. Professional development is disconnected. Accountability is shared in name only.

This study exists because the research on trust between these two leadership groups is nearly nonexistent. We know what happens when collaboration fails. We do not yet have a national picture of why it fails or what conditions make it possible.

This survey is the first step toward that picture. The findings will be published and shared widely with the field to support better structures, better conversations, and better outcomes for students.

Distrust and Its Origins
How distrust develops between special education and general education leadership and what structural conditions sustain it.
Shared Accountability
Whether accountability for student outcomes is genuinely shared or remains siloed by role and program type.
Resource Allocation
How resource decisions are made and whether those processes build or erode trust across leadership teams.
Professional Development
The role of joint professional learning in building or breaking down the divide between program areas.
Structural Conditions
What organizational structures, policies, and leadership practices create the conditions for genuine collaboration.

The questions this study is designed to answer

Each of the 46 survey items maps to one of five research questions. Together they provide a comprehensive picture of the trust dynamic between special education and general education leadership in U.S. public schools.

01

Research Question 1

What are the primary sources of distrust?

Examining the specific professional, structural, and relational factors that generate distrust between special education directors and general education leaders in district settings.

02

Research Question 2

How is accountability for student outcomes shared?

Exploring whether and how responsibility for students with disabilities is distributed across leadership teams and whether that distribution reflects genuine partnership.

03

Research Question 3

How do resource allocation processes affect trust?

Investigating how decisions about staffing, funding, time, and materials are made and whether those processes strengthen or undermine cross-functional relationships.

04

Research Question 4

What role does professional development play?

Assessing whether joint professional learning opportunities exist, how they are structured, and whether they contribute meaningfully to shared understanding and trust.

05

Research Question 5

What structural conditions enable genuine collaboration?

Identifying the organizational features, leadership behaviors, and systemic practices that create environments where special and general education leadership can work as true partners.

A 46-item instrument built for precision and nuance

The survey uses three distinct measurement approaches, each chosen to capture different dimensions of the trust dynamic between leadership teams.

Role-based conditional logic ensures that question framing adjusts based on the respondent's role — whether they identify primarily as a special education leader or a general education leader — so that the data reflects each perspective accurately without forcing artificial equivalence.

The result is a measurement instrument that is rigorous enough to produce publishable findings and grounded enough in real district experience to feel relevant to everyone who takes it.

Likert Scales
Five-point agreement and perception scales measuring attitudes toward trust, collaboration, and shared responsibility across leadership pairs.
Behavioral Frequency Scales
Frequency-based items capturing how often specific practices occur — joint planning, shared decision making, cross-functional professional learning.
Forced-Choice Ranking
Priority-ordering items that surface how leaders rank competing values and structural conditions when they cannot select all of them.
Role-Based Conditional Logic
Adaptive question framing that adjusts based on respondent type, ensuring special and general education leaders answer from their actual vantage point.

This survey is designed for leaders at every level

The survey uses role-based conditional logic so that each respondent answers from their own leadership perspective. All responses are confidential and contribute to a national dataset.

Special Education Directors and Administrators

District-level special education directors, coordinators, and supervisors who work alongside or under general education district leadership. Your perspective on trust and accountability from the special education side is the core of this study.

General Education District Leaders

Superintendents, assistant superintendents, curriculum directors, and other general education district administrators who share oversight with special education leadership. Your view from the general education side is equally essential to the research.

Building-Level Administrators

Principals and assistant principals who navigate the intersection of special education and general education implementation daily. Your ground-level view of how these leadership dynamics play out in schools adds a critical dimension to the dataset.

Study led by practitioners who have lived this work

This research is grounded in decades of direct experience inside special education and general education leadership — not observation from the outside.

Dr. Nikki Harding
Principal Investigator
Dr. Nikki Harding, Ed.D.
CEO and Founder, Inclusive Leadership Lab
24 years in special education as a teacher, building leader, and director. Doctoral work focused on educator development and IEP quality. Parent of a child with Down syndrome. Has sat on both sides of the IEP table and brought both perspectives into this research.
Dr. Crista Grimwood
Co-Investigator
Dr. Crista Grimwood, Ed.D.
Chief Academic Officer, Inclusive Leadership Lab
Ed.D. with expertise in academic architecture and curriculum design. Ensures every research instrument and program within the Lab is built on research that translates to real classroom and district practice — not just curriculum that looks good on paper.

Participate in the Research

Your voice belongs in this data

This study only works if leaders across the country participate. The survey takes 12 to 15 minutes and your responses are fully confidential.

Bridging the Divide: National Research Survey

Complete all 46 items below. The survey uses role-based logic so questions will adjust based on your leadership role. Estimated time is 12 to 15 minutes.

46 items · Likert, frequency, and ranking scales
12 to 15 minutes to complete
100% confidential · Aggregate reporting only

Your participation is voluntary and confidential

This study collects no personally identifying information. All responses are reported in aggregate only. Participation is entirely voluntary and you may stop at any time without consequence.

Results will be shared publicly through publications and presentations to benefit the broader field of special education and general education leadership. Individual districts and respondents will never be identifiable in any published findings.

Questions about the study or data use may be directed to [email protected] or [email protected].